Cog week10 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Cog week10 - Essay ExampleFurthermore the base rate and a straitlaced way to reduce it mentioned in terms of simple, uninterrupted, intentional time which result in greater aptitude in understanding and deducing the information we need by assessing the risks and rewards accurately is the right fit considering the decision devising error. Assignment 3 A brief description of one failure of deductive reasoning that you sight or experienced in the past week or so, similar to those in the Wason Selection task and veritable(prenominal) Reasoning experiments. A recent example that I experienced was that when I was home only and waiting for the transmission line repair guy. I was working in the kitchen so when I heard a knock I didnt bother to look but jumped to the conclusion that it was cable guy. So without sentiment I asked him to come in since the knock on the threshold coincided with my thought process and anticipation regarding the cable guy. So I failed to use valid deduc tive reasoning as I followed the situation incorrectly( p then q), so I assumed q then p. Later I realized how wrong I was when I realized I had invited a complete stranger into the house by incorrectly take for granted it was the cable guy, an encounter which gave me a start as I momentarily stared at the unknown soul in shock. Then, in the context of your examples, explain the impediments (e.g., heuristic, bias, etc.) to individually process (deductive and inductive), and suggest methods or techniques for improving each process Heuristic is what basically influenced by reasoning for the incorrect assumption that the knock on the door was the cable guy. In order to improve my thinking process in such incidents and situations it is imperative that I keep a alert mind and recognize fallacies that occur in deductive reasoning. I should measure out my thinking and consider alternatives which all overcome any biases that I might experience and lead me to confidently drive conclus ions without really considering them. A brief description of one failure of inductive reasoning that you observed or experienced in the past week or so, similar to those in the Wason Selection Task and Typical Reasoning experiments. An example that I can relate to that of inductive reasoning was when I saw these devil dogs fighting over what appeared to be a large bone which was buried not too cloudy in this pile of things. During this fight another dog came and joined in the fight and the three fought over the bone for a while. When the third dog had joined in through these observations I assumed that he was actually the one that was the owner of the bone and that he had hidden it in the pile of things. However, after a while when I had looked away and turned my attention back towards them I saw that a existence way aggressively waving to get rid of these dogs and that I had wrongly induced to be a bone was actually a large packet of meat shaped like a bone. Then, in the conte xt of your examples, explain the impediments (e.g., heuristic, bias, etc.) to each process (deductive and inductive), and suggest methods or techniques for improving each process proof bias is the key reasons that lead to my inaccurate assumptions. Turns out I was focusing on all the aspects that seemed to incarnate what I had already